 |
As everybody knows, this proposal was successful,
since it would keep the traditional and catholic civilization
on one side and on the other side obtain a form of
confederation, and if really and correctly implemented,
it could satisfy all the needs of that time. Gioberti's
Neo-Guelphism had an even greater success after the
election in 1846 of a Pope, Pious IX, who was in favour
of this project and with his reforms became the living
symbol (against his will) of the Italian Risorgimento
in its first phase.

Portrait of Pope Pious IX |
Facing
the more and more numerous political concessions
made in Rome by Pious IX, Ferdinand was sceptic,
although he did not oppose the basic idea of
Gioberti's project: also Ferdinand truly loved
Italy. But he had almost ruled for twenty years
and had learnt also by his grandfather's experience
that he had to be suspicious towards liberals
and revolutionists (and perhaps in his heart
he was also suspicious about the sincerity of
some other Italian sovereigns...). However,
on 12 January 1848 an autonomist revolt broke
out in Sicily.
Ferdinand, annoyed that others were implementing
reforms and he had to solve the problems related
to them, made a brave and challenging action:
until then he had had no part in the general
reformist movement inaugurated by Pious IX,
now he got ahead of all other Italian sovereigns
and granted the constitution and in so doing
he put the Pope, the Grand Duke of Tuscany,
the Dukes of Parma and Modena and Charles Albert
in Turin in an awkward situation. All of them,
after Ferdinand's action, were forced to grant
the constitution one after the other. |
At
this point, it was clear that the balance and order
set in Vienna in 1815 had failed; moreover, a revolt
had broken out also in Vienna, and Metternich had
left the scene; on 18 March, taking advantage of this,
the Milanese had risen up, chased out the Austrians
and demanded all Italian sovereigns to take arms against
the Hapsburg and in favour of the Italian independence.
After hesitating for a while, also Charles Albert
had entered Lombardy with his army and was marching
towards the Austrian "Quadrilateral". In
short, that was the right moment to implement Gioberti’s
plan.
Pious IX was ready and sent troops not to attack but
to defend Italy; also the Grand Duke of Tuscany sent
his troops. Ferdinand, in this situation of real and
effective unity of the Italians for independence,
did not back out and sent his army. It was the magic
moment of Italian history! All united for independence,
but according to the purposes of Neo-Guelphism: a
federal and Catholic Italy, and therefore a monarchic
and legitimist one. The problem, however, was that
not everybody supported that plan... First of all
the democrats, who everywhere, and especially in Florence,
Rome and Naples aimed at the realisation of Mazzini’s
project, a republican transformation of the traditional
order; and then Charles Albert, who showed every day
in a clearer way his real intentions, which were not
those of Neo-Guelphism, but simply those of realising
the old dream of the Savoy Family: the annexation
of Lombardy and if possible Veneto. At this point
Ferdinand sensed the danger and changed his approach
(in the meanwhile also Pious IX withdrew his troops
because it was clear that a golpe was being prepared
in Rome by Mazzini’s followers and also because
Vienna was threatening the Pope with schism if he
hadn’t stopped his fight against the Catholic
Empire and, although he loved Italy, Pious IX was
first of all the pontiff of all Catholics across the
world and then the sovereign of an Italian State):
through an action of force, he first withdrew the
constitution not to loose completely the power and
leave the rule in the hands of Mazzini’s followers
(as it was happening in Rome and Florence); it was
a real danger, that several local revolts in the southern
provinces of the Kingdom were stressing; then he withdrew
his soldiers from the front, considering that they
were dying to give Lombardy to Charles Albert (and
not for the creation of an Italian Federation) and
that their death was therefore meaningless; then he
conquered Sicily manu militari, and thus put an end
to all disorders and revolutionary ambitions and showed
he was a man of character as few other ones in the
whole Italian history. But he was also generous: he
reprieved the condemned men who had rebelled in '48,
and the revolutionists repaid his generosity with
an attempt to his life (miraculously failed) perpetrated
by Agesilao Milano (an officer from Calabria) in 1856:
this was the only capital punishment that the King
did not reprieve, due to the fanatic ungratefulness
showed on that occasion. Also his foreign policy always
showed him as an energetic and clear-minded king whose
aim was the interests of his people, for which he
was ready to say no even to Austria and Great Britain.
For example, in the ‘30s, when he was still
a young sovereign, he stood up to Palmerston for the
famous event of the Sicilian sulphurs. It happened
that in 1816 the British Government had convinced
Ferdinand to grant them the monopoly of the sulphur
exploitation in Sicily for very little, and the Kingdom
did not receive any profit. Ferdinand II did not like
that; moreover, he had cancelled the tax on flour
not to burden the people and therefore needed money.
So he decided to give the monopoly to a French company
that paid twice as much than England. Palmerston immediately
sent a military fleet to the Gulf of Naples and threatened
the city with bombing. Ferdinand II revealed his character,
held out, and prepared his fleet and army to the war.
The situation was settled by the intervention of Louis
Philip King of France: the king had to repay both
the British and the French (since the monopoly was
kept by the British, who never forgot the insult)
for the damage caused .
|